The company I work for decided to change banks after being with a particular establishment for years. Because of the length of time with the old bank, little thought had previously been given about what was needed in a new institution. So, after doing research, a local bank was chosen as the new bank. A team met and a plan was formulated about what financial products we needed and how the transition should occur. Accounts were established and a training timeline was determined.
However, during the introductory meeting there were some red flags
signaling that not all the parties were on the same page or having a shared
understanding. Acronyms were used by the
bank employees that didn’t make sense to those of us attending from my
company. We attempted to ask clarifying
questions, but I think our lack of knowledge and fear of being embarrassed shut
down our willingness to ask more probing questions. As a result, we signed up for a set of
financial products believed to be fitting of our needs.
Shortly after this process, we received a little machine in the mail
from a bank. It was absolutely foreign
to us. But we asked no questions, moved
forward with the training regimen, and signed up for our first educational
session. It quickly became evident
during this training that we had been signed up for a platform far more robust
than our needs. Further, the products we
had been assigned didn’t communicate with the accounting software we
utilize. About ten minutes into this
meeting, I stopped the session and asked if the bankers could use language
other than acronyms and banking phrases.
I then asked if they could communicate with us using simple terms. Thankfully, we had a fabulous trainer, and
she quickly assessed that we didn’t have the products best suited for our
needs. She made a pivot and showed us
what she believed we should be using. And
she was correct. The simpler products
met all our needs and communicated with our accounting software. During this exchange she made a reflective comment
about the disservice that had been done by using banking acronyms and
terminology that only they understood.
It struck me that many of us fall prey to the tendency of using language
that isn’t as clear, direct, or simple as it could be. In the process, it muddies the communication
and leaves the listener feeling unsure. It
also puts the burden on the receiver to ask for more information or clearer instructions. And sometimes they may not even know that
they didn’t understand enough of the message to ask for more clarification. It would be much easier if the communicator
took the ownership of having their words and thoughts be direct and transparent. Thankfully, the issue at the bank was quickly
resolved and a great relationship exists between the institution and us. However, think of the times where
misunderstandings happen that permanently fracture relationships. How many of these could have been avoided by
clearer and more thoughtful communication?
Not making assumptions that everyone has the same perspective, shared
understanding, or knowledge is a better platform to hold conversations.
To this day, I still don’t know what the gadget does that we were sent
in the mail from the bank. And I still
don’t know all the acronyms and terms the bankers used in our initial meeting. But this is okay because it was “extra” that
didn’t have to be there to make our banking experience great. In fact, we probably would have been better
served not getting the additional do-hickey in the mail because of the confusion
it created. Removing the extra
do-hickeys in our own language could serve us all, too.
Changepoints:
Think of a time when
someone used words, phrases, or acronyms you didn’t understand:
·
How
did it feel to be without a full context or understanding because of the
verbiage used by others? What did you do
to bridge the gap?
·
When
might you inadvertently use words that isolate others because there is a lack
of shared understanding? How do these
experiences hinder the relationships?
·
Who
do you know who models clear, direct, and conscience communication? How does it aid them and those around them?
·
What
misunderstandings can be avoided when we chose simpler ways of communicating
with others, both in personal and professional arenas?
o
What
ways can you create checks-and-balances with your words to try to communicate
clearly with others?
o
How
can you let others know when you don’t fully understand what they are trying to
say?
There
is a time and place to use abbreviations, flowery language, and technical
words. Make sure you have the right
audience and setting lest it become an unneeded communication do-hickey.
outSIGHTin, LLC: Creating awareness
as a changepoint for improved organizational results.
No comments:
Post a Comment